Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

Monsters vs. Aliens

Share

  • rss

By Robert Wilonsky

Published on March 24, 2009 at 10:25am

Monsters vs. Aliens is strictly playbook material for DreamWorks, makers of kidult-friendly pop-culture mash-ups. But it has one thing going for it that its predecessors did not: It will heretofore be known as the first 3-D movie to render all previous comers headache-inducing charlatans, rinky-dink pretenders. For the first time in the medium's history, you are there — from the president's war room to a prison facility where the government has been storing assorted mutants and monsters since the 1950s. But the chasm between the movie's technical accomplishment and artistic achievement is vast. The story is familiar. And as good as the performers are — from Seth Rogen as a blue blob to Reese Witherspoon as a 50-foot woman — they're still doing their trademark schtick (though Stephen Colbert as the president is a stroke of casting brilliance). But the grandeur of the effects — the spectacle of the thing — elevates Monsters vs. Aliens to something approaching art. It's not a masterpiece, but it's most certainly a milestone.