In this week's update from soon-to-be-former state Rep. Cynthia Davis, the O'Fallon Loon takes on the most sinister kind of gayhood: gay parenting. Repeatedly referring to homosexual relationships as "tragedies," Davis writes that children have a right to non-gay parents.
The Loon remarks that no matter how hard they try, gay parents can only aspire to be "very good friends" with their impostor children. If they didn't squeeze the child out of their bodies or if they weren't married to someone who did, it doesn't count:
Just because two people are living together does not meanBut don't worry! Cynthia's strong anti-gay parenthood position is backed up by both science and hard numbers. Lookie here:
the non-biological "live-in" is entitled to be the other parent of the
child. When a person is not related to the child by adoption or by
birth, they may be very good friends, but they are not parents.
Because of biological facts, homosexuals cannot reproduce. There is a growing trend to create a baby through artificial methods, however this still only allows for the woman who actually gave birth to be listed on the birth certificate. I agree with only allowing the child to have one parent listed because the break up rate between homosexuals is very high.Not convinced yet? Here's the proof:
Some of the states trying to create a legal bond between homosexuals discovered it makes things more complex than ever when they break up --- and that break up rate is about 87%.Don't try to corroborate that statistic, because you can't without Googling Cynthia Davis' brain: that's the only other place it shows up (and it's easy to get confused in there, given all of those voices shouting over each other).