Monday, January 31, 2011

Rightbloggers credit Bush for Egypt uprising -- then blame Obama for Egypt uprising

Posted By on Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM

click to enlarge rightbloggers_thumb_200x230.jpg

Hordes of citizens stand up to their nation's hated leader. But

observers worry that when the revolution finally comes, religious

fundamentalists hostile to democracy will seize power.

We're not talking about the Tea Party this time -- we're talking about

the ongoing, massive demonstrations against Egyptian President Hosni

Mubarak.

Rightbloggers were torn about this one. While many at first enjoyed the

people-power street scenes as a celebration of freedom, their enthusiasm

waned as they realized that Muslims were involved.


Americans are easily excited by foreign uprisings, particularly

those they can follow on Twitter. As the sensational photos and coverage

began to come in from Egypt, rightbloggers joined in the excitement.

Many claimed the uprising was all George W. Bush's doing, because he

said some nice things about freedom in Egypt once upon a time.

He had inspired the revolution with his kind words for dissidents in 2008, suggested National Review's Jay Nordlinger.

"Bush gave a speech that stood on the side of the men and women in the

prison cells," said Nordlinger, misty-eyed, whereas "in America, the

Left hated any talk from Bush about freedom and democracy... That

American woman -- the type of American I know all too well -- might have

said, repeatedly, 'Democracy is overrated.' But I don't think so. Bush

doesn't think so. And the people in the streets of Cairo and other

Egyptian cities don't think so."

Cue the strings! Never mind that, though Bush warned Mubarak on human rights a few times, we nonetheless continued to pour billions of U.S. dollars

into Mubarak's government -- and money means much more to autocrats

than do harsh words. Also, never mind that under Obama U.S. aid to

Mubarak has been cut substantially. In the giant game of Risk Junior: Narnia that is the rightblogger vision of foreign policy, it's the thought that counts.

The headline "Egypt protests show George W. Bush was right" was disseminated all over the internet by rightbloggers. "President Bush believed that Muslims in the Middle East would prefer Liberty to oppression," said The Last Tradition. "Liberals vehemently thought he was wrong."

twittergreen.jpg
What this uprising needs is some uniformly modified Twitter icons.
​"It is interesting to wonder," wrote the Weekly Standard's Lee Smith,

"what might have happened had these same protests erupted 5 years ago

when the Bush White House was feeling its oats with victories for the

freedom agenda in Iraq and then Lebanon." Smith seemed to think Bush

would have gone to Cairo with a bullhorn to rally the protesters.

Right, Wing-Nut

took a deep breath and yelled that "Barack Obama's star, once deemed

brightest in the firmament, dimming more rapidly than a

government-approved fluorescent bulb, while George W. Bush's returns to a

glory he may not have seen since the early days of the post-9/11 era,

all without saying a word," etc etc.

R,W-N then raged at the New York Times for not sharing his enthusiasm -- "If you can't speak ill of George W. Bush, the Times seems to feel, don't speak of him at all" -- and answered the words he had imputed to the Times,

"That's fine. Don't speak of him. Your filthy mouths are not fit to

utter his great name." R,W-N also claimed that "the hard core left is

conceding Bush's points," offering in evidence the testimony of the

noted hardcore leftist, Fareed Zakaria of Newsweek.

When Egypt's rulers pulled the plug on their nation's internet, rightbloggers sprang into action, accusing Obama of wanting to do the same thing. "Egypt Today, USA Tomorrow," roared Kristinn Taylor and Andrea Shea King

at Andrew Breitbart's Big Government, claiming that Senate Bill S.21

is an "internet kill switch" the President can use to cut off online

communications once the Tea Partiers finally decide it's shooty-shooty

time.

Some of the brethren gave the Egyptian protesters their highest honor: Comparison to the Tea Party movement.


"If we ever have social unrest here, it won't possibly look this bad, right?" said RightDog

of the Charleston (SC) Tea Party. "Why, just because our economy is on

the ropes, our kids have been dumbed down to believing that Jonathan

Stewart is a legitimate a news source, our adults consumed with Oprah

and Survivor and American Idol and Bachelor and cheap Chinese

merchandise, and our 'leaders' are wandering about with one thumb up

their backsides," etc etc. (We think it's sarcasm.)

"Tea party and other activists will see this as hint of what could happen here with an over-zealous President," said Marooned in Marin.

"Given a similar economic state of affairs currently faced in the

United States and the spontaneous rise and seizure of power by an

independent movement such as the Tea Party," said ButAsForMe,

"perhaps the Administration is worried about a domino effect spreading

to the U.S....""If you support the right of American Tea Partiers to

gather together and protest their government," said National Review's Jim Geraghty, "I don't quite understand why you would deny the average Egyptian the same right."

bushmubarak.jpg
    So Bush is like, "Make democracy"
    And Hosni is like "Um No"
    And Bush is like "WTF LOL"
​But eventually rightbloggers began to catch on that when Mubarak goes, radical Islamists -- particularly members of the Muslim Brotherhood -- could well take advantage of the resulting power vacuum, leading to a brand new, anti-American Islamic Republic.

National Review's Michael Ledeen

thought America could still muscle the situation to our benefit: We

should "try to pick and choose," he said, "supporting real democrats and

thwarting the likes of al Baradei, the love child of both the Muslim

Brotherhood and the Tehran crowd." That ought to go over big with the

Egyptians! Now to find those real democrats, or import them from

whatever CIA compound we keep them in.

(The piece also contains Ledeen's "Carthago delenda set,"

a call to "finally support democratic revolution in Iran," and this

deathless neocon paen to freedom: "For the president to say 'Egypt's

destiny will be determined by the Egyptian people,' or 'everyone wants

to be free' is silly and dangerous.")

Generally speaking, rightbloggers were sure Obama was blowing it, one

way or the other. Most of their accusations were at first strictly ad

hominem.

"Obama has shown himself to be too indecisive for the job of American President," reported Blackfive.

"He makes Commander in Chief decisions based on domestic political

dynamics, and he makes foreign policy decisions....well he just pretty

much doesn't." Also: "Obama left foreign policy out of his SOTU speech

for a good reason, he has no earthly clue what to do." Mee-ow! In case

you thought Blackfive had only rhetoric on his side, he added hard

evidence, e.g., "The Iranians laughed as [Obama] sat out their slaughter

and subsequent pogroms against the Green revolutionaries and now he

dithers while Egyptians die." Ripping stuff, though it might have been

more convincing had Blackfive included videos of the laughing Iranians.

And for connoisseurs of mendacity, your moment of Jim Hoft: "As Egypt Burns... Obama Parties."

Eventually the brethren began to make an important adjustment relevant to the new realities: If the revolution could turn out badly, then obviously it had been engineered by Obama and the liberal media on purpose to hurt America.


Biased BBC

accused reporter Jeremy Bowen of "going out of his way to allay any

fears the British public may have concerning the rise to power of the

Muslim Brotherhood should Mubarak fall in Egypt." The reason, conveyed

sarcastically: "Israel's threat is Al Bowen's opportunity? Surely not."

(They call him "Al Bowen" because they and other right-wingers believe him to be hostile to Israel, in case you missed the joke.)

streiff of RedState claimed reports

that Obama met with members of the Muslim Brotherhood in 2009 meant

that "the Obama Administration seems to think it has found a working

partner in the Muslim Brotherhood. Why the Administration believes

cavorting with an organization that is both violent and islamist makes

sense is as unclear as [President Jimmy] Carter's man-crush on [Iran's

Ayatollah] Khomeini." Actually the Brotherhood has not shown much public enthusiasm for Obama, but presumably they're keeping their love affair secret, in order to increase its America-destroying potential.

Another RedState cognomen, LaborUnionReport,

added its bombshell report, "The American Left's Role in Leading

Mid-East Regime Change: What the U.S. State Dept, Unions and New Media

Companies are doing to foment chaos."

"Signs are beginning to point more toward the likelihood that President

Obama's State Department, unions, as well as Left-leaning media

corporations are more directly involved in helping to ignite the

Mid-East turmoil than they are publicly admitting," said LUR.

What? LUR pointed to the recent, successful uprising in Tunisia, in

which news reports said labor unions were involved. Maybe you're

thinking of Lech Walesa's Solidarity

in Poland, but LUR wants you to think of a different

politically-engaged union -- the socialist AFL-CIO, whose Solidarity

Center, "which works with other union around the globe," LUR reported,

"has been supporting Egyptian unions for quite some time." Aha! Plus,

Obama "applauded the courage and dignity of protesting Tunisians," which fact LUR rendered in boldface to enhance the perfidy.

As for the media angle, Obama called for Mubarak to restore the internet

in Egypt, which LUR found suspicious. "For an administration that seems

to be trying to walk a fine line between supporting an ally and

'respecting the rights of the Egyptian people,'" said LUR, "a call to

turn the internet back on seemed rather odd." Well, sure it does --

everyone knows Obama wants to shut the internet down himself!

The wow finish: "It appears the world may be witnessing the first

internet-led attempts at 'regime change,' orchestrated by President

Obama and his allies on the Left."

bridgehose.jpg
Don't hose down my back and tell me it's raining!

The excitable Pamela Geller

of Atlas Shrugs was an earlier adopter of the anti-uprising theme,

saying "Iran has its hooves all over this" and making the case for

retaining Mubarak: "Egypt is a secular government. The objective for all

freedom-loving peoples in the world should be a transition to a new

secular government. Will those elements in the protest movement be able

to stave off Islamic supremacists? Iranian imperialism? I think not."

Later

Fox News interviewed an officer of CAIR on the subject, and Geller

exploded: "Horrible. We expect this from the leftist apologist cable

networks, but FOX is dangerous because they pretend to get it."

Enemies everywhere! She gained another when Alex Pareene mentioned Geller's posts at Salon, setting her off yet again:

"Where were these jackals when the Iranians were marching for freedom

against an Islamic regime (one that these leftist tools are helping to

install in Egypt)? ... Much to the left's chagrin, the Egyptian people

are not burning American and Israeli flags. But I am sure CODE PINK and

CAIR are working their magic over in Egypt..." etc.

Geller then went to Breitbart's Big Government to tell the world

about "Obama's Carter Moment," claiming Obama was planning to throw

Mubarak "under the bus," that "we see the hand of Iran behind what is

unfolding in Egypt," Obama is a "quisling," etc.

Never a dull moment with Pamela Geller. But we have to give them all a

round of applause for showing they can make a collective 180° -- from "Democracy! Whiskey! Sexy!" to gloomy Realpolitik -- on such short notice. That, friends, is what you call message discipline.


Tags: , ,

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

All contents ©2014 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation