Friday, February 6, 2009

Calorie information does affect peoples' habits

Posted by Owen Morris on Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:00 PM

subway_calories_on_menu.jpg


With obesity the problem it is in today's society, there are several schools of thought on how best to eliminate it. Ideas range from promoting exercise to banning certain foods. Somewhere in the middle lies the plan New York City's Board of Health passed unanimously this past October. All chain restaurants must now post calorie data on their menus.

Some chains, like Subway and McDonald's, are already open about their nutrition info. But many chains are not -- specifically the Olive Garden and Chipotle, whose menus don't necessarily have the reputation of being bad for you even when they are.

Yesterday, the first study measuring the effectiveness of New York's method was released and the results are staggering.

People's food habits are rapidly changing because of the order. Specifically, the survey by food consultants Technomic found that

"86 percent of New York City restaurant-goers were surprised by the

calorie count information... 90 percent of them claiming that the

calorie count was higher than expected. As a consequence, 82 percent

say that calorie disclosure is affecting what they order and 60 percent

say it is affecting where they visit."

In data-speak, those numbers are almost unheard of. Nine out of ten

jaded New Yorkers were surprised by the calorie numbers. If only

half of the survey's responders who said the calorie disclosures were affecting their orders were telling the truth, that would still be

more than 40 percent of New Yorkers. Even the most successful restaurants

can't survive 40 percent customer losses forever.

Already the first national calorie disclosure bill has been put before Congress

so it's only a matter of time before it becomes a national

mandate.

The sooner the better. It may not take mandated exercise or taxes to curb obesity. Just knowledge.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

And yes, the turkey burger calorie count is for the sandwich ONLY.

report   
Posted by jjskck on February 27, 2009 at 10:01 AM

I would welcome this with open arms, and I am one of the few people I know who has a good grasp of the actual calorie content of the stuff I order.

Fast food is not the problem, as most people have a general idea that McDonald's ain't health food.

It's places like Chili's and Ruby Tuesday that will do you in. How about some 1,000-calorie chicken tacos, or a 900-calorie turkey burger--items you would maybe think are healthy? This obviously doesn't even get into the ubiquitous 1500-calorie chicken strip baskets.

And great point, Emily. Chipotle falls into the above category. I think a lot of people would be stunned at how many calories their burrito has. Hell, the wrap itself is 300 calories!

report   
Posted by jjskck on February 27, 2009 at 9:59 AM

I was so happy when New York passed that bill� not that I ate at too many chains, but when I was hungover and craving a Big Mac, it certainly helped deter me. Chipotle, however, is tricky. For the burritos it says something like 300�1000 calories. Sure you can get a 300-calorie burrito at Chipotle. It's chock full of lettuce and salsa. And that's all. This clears it up, and will probably make you sad: http://www.chipotlefan.com/ind...

report   
Posted by Emily1 on February 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Latest in Fat City

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation