Monday, March 16, 2009

Calories on menus: suggestion or gospel?

Posted by Owen Morris on Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM

starbuckspnoeric_thumb_510x201.jpg
Flickr:Pnoeric

More restaurant chains are under fire for misrepresenting the calorie counts on their menus.  This time it's Starbucks and Dunkin' Donuts who are in hot water after a news station in New York found "caloric inaccuracies." New York City was the first city to require calorie information on the chain menus, and similar bills have been proposed all over the country, including Missouri.

Local chain Applebee's faced similar criticism over items on its special Weight Watcher's menu that had three times as much fat as advertised. This lead to a class-action lawsuit against Applebee's last month alleging that the company purposely misled diners on calorie information.

Neither Starbucks nor Dunkin' Donuts has been sued (yet). Some of the revelations are shocking -- a Starbucks' peach apple tart was listed at 120 calories but actually contained 280. Blueberry muffins were also higher in calories than advertised.

What's lost in all this outrage is how much consumers should depend on calorie information in the first place. It's important to let customers know that something they think only contains 500 calories actually contains 1,500 but for items like a blueberry muffin, when people are buying it even when it's labeled as 400-plus calories, an extra hundred calories is not that big of a difference.

The issue is different for a sit-down restaurant like Applebee's. No two chicken breasts are going to have the exact same number of calories, just as a line server may put an extra ounce of mashed potatoes on a plate. In a controlled laboratory it may be easy to duplicate a dish's calories but in an actual kitchen, variables are going to happen.

Calories on menus should be taken with a grain of salt. They're a guide to making healthy choices but not a way to count individual calories.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires. Nice Stuff. I'm looking forward to reading more from you.

report   
Posted by forexInvestor on 05/21/2009 at 7:38 PM

Great post. Gives me what I have been looking for.

report   
Posted by HotGirl on 04/23/2009 at 11:48 AM

I just want to let you know that I have benefited from the information here. Thanks a lot.

report   
Posted by HotWomen on 03/25/2009 at 11:04 PM

Good post, your post could really help me in my work. Hopefully this will help increase my traffic more. Thanks for sharing.

report   
Posted by Simonn on 03/21/2009 at 5:51 PM

Calories on menus should be taken with a grain of salt. They're a guide to making healthy choices but not a way to count individual calories.

Absolutely. Each sandwich or taco or slice of pizza will necessarily vary based on how heavy-handed the cook is with the cheese. This information is most helpful in making comparisons, like when the chicken tacos seem like the right choice until you see they're listed at 1100 calories and the sirloin seems wrong until you see it's only 600.

That's why I believe everyone should have this information.

report   
Posted by jjskck on 03/18/2009 at 9:34 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation