Friday, March 27, 2009

Tracking food? What law?

Posted by Owen Morris on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:30 AM

click to enlarge foodhazardjoannapoe.jpg

Somewhere in health class I learned that the key to prevention is education. Food manufacturers did not take the same health class, or else 25 percent of them would have known that there's a federal law (and not even a new one!) that requires them to keep track of suppliers.

A report prepared by the Department of Health and Human Services says it surveyed numerous food merchants about its sources and the results are scary. As the New York Times reports:

Of those 118

firms, 70 failed to provide investigators with required information

about suppliers or customers, with 6 of the companies failing to

provide any information at all. One vendor told investigators

that it kept no records of tomato purchases. Tomatoes have repeatedly

been implicated in nationwide food contamination scares, including one last year. Fifteen facilities told investigators they mixed raw products from more than 10 farms.

It's because many of these companies didn't follow the law in the first place that products shipped by the Peanut Corporation of America are still being recalled two months later. It also brings into question what good will be accomplished by new laws like COOL if the FDA is too short-handed to enforce old ones.

Understaffing due to lack of money has long been a problem at the FDA.

In 2007, the agency tried to close down more than half of its testing

labs to save money, which kicked up a "firestorm" of controversy. As the AP reported at the time, "FDA's

staff can conduct only a cursory review of imports, generally

dedicating just 30 seconds to each shipment as it flashes by on a

computer screen."

The FDA's other argument to close the labs

was that they were compromised by merchants. "Investigative counsel

Kevin Barstow said he

was told by an unnamed FDA deputy lab director that "none of the test

results he's seen are completely accurate.... The words he used were 'not good' and 'spooky.'"

In

some ways, this is a wonderful time for the FDA to ask for money

because the government is spending and both sides agree that the food

system in America needs an overhaul. On the other hand, as the peanut

butter salmonella cases subside and the controversy disappears, it may

seem too easy to pronounce the FDA "fixed" just because it's had

several months without an epidemic. Right now, there are lots of words about changing the FDA. Hopefully action is not far behind.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation