Monday, August 3, 2009

Giving penicillin to Bessie?

Posted by Jonathan Bender on Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM

click to enlarge cow.080309.jpg

The debate over whether to give livestock certain classes of antibiotics has returned to the floor of the House of Representatives.

A bill proposed back in March by U.S. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-New York) is attempting to restrict the use of antibiotics to prevent illness in farm animals. She's responding to concerns that the drugs are losing their potency because they're being used too often. Farm advocacy groups argue that the measure would lead to reduced yields, in turn resulting in higher prices at market and a greater need for imported meat.

But that's the idea, according to Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the deputy commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration:

"We're looking at ways to phase out the use of antibiotics for growth

promotion and food efficiency in livestock," Sharfstein told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Sharfstein is pushing to have veterinarians oversee which antibiotics are given to farm animals. The legislation seeks to ban the use of seven classes of drugs -- including tetracycline and penicillin -- "in the absence of any clinical sign of disease." The bill is H.R. 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009.

U.S. Rep. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) spoke out against the bill

recently on the floor of the House. He noted the complexity of the

current agrarian system and said this bill would throw that system into

chaos, requiring the government to shoulder too much responsibility. In

addition, he expressed concerns over the FDA telling farmers how to

farm.

The debate over antibiotics being given to livestock is a global issue,

with the World Health Organization recently pushing for limits and

decreased use of antibiotics. And marketers and producers have taken

notice, advertising "antibiotic-free" meat and emphasizing the

conditions in which animals are raised and slaughtered. But antibiotic-free meat comes

with a price. It's typically more expensive and right now the

Agriculture Department doesn't restrict who can use that label. 

It's a complicated issue, one that will be decided by the market if the legislation stalls, as it has at the state level.

Tags: , , ,

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation