Tuesday, October 6, 2009

A closer look at beef inspection

Posted by Jonathan Bender on Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:15 AM

beef.inspection.100609.jpg

Ground beef is one of the few foods that can make me uneasy because I can't divorce the delicious joy of eating burgers from the very real fear of E.Coli contamination. While the odds suggest that a severe infection or death are highly unlikely, our current food safety system makes me weigh the benefits and risks in the same way I'd check to see whether a bungee cord operator really cares about whether I'm strapped in tightly. 

This results in a binge-dieting-like approach to burger consumption, where I go weeks without a burger and then, over a few days, inhale every hamburger that's not nailed down. A burger doesn't sound so good today, in the wake of The New York Timesopus on the 2007 E.Coli outbreak. The story is full of stats that are difficult to digest -- like, more than 3,000 grocery stores in 41 states issued recalls of ground beef ... this summer.

According to the Times article, the main safety risks would appear to be

inadequate testing for E.Coli and the use of trimmings -- essentially

byproducts of meat and fat that are bought from slaughterhouses by some

major meat manufacturers. That remainder is then turned into patties

because it is cheaper.

Testing has been a point of contention since the 1994 ban on selling ground beef contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 was imposed. The Agriculture Department opted to carry out its own tests for E. coli, but it acknowledges that its 15,000 spot checks a year at thousands of meat plants and groceries nationwide is not meant to be comprehensive.
While regulators and meat manufacturers sort through the process of testing and which cuts should be used, the Barf Blog offers a food safety sheet on how to properly handle ground beef. You still ready to take that leap?

[Image via Flickr: bagaball]

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

jjskck,

I do hope you will read the NY Times article. I too have a cavalier attitude toward food, at times, but the Times article really got my attention. I'm considering never buying hamburger, and investing in a grinder so I can make my own. Even if most burger is safe, the prospect of eating something that can kill me or leave me paralyzed is not something I want to contemplate.

Seriously, everybody, please read and come to your own conclusions.

report   
Posted by Bob on October 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM

the use of trimmings -- essentially byproducts of meat and fat that are bought from slaughterhouses by some major meat manufacturers. That remainder is then turned into patties because it is cheaper.

All the more reason to avoid burgers from fast food chains like BK or Hardee's and stick with places that serve the real deal. L.C.'s up north of the river, for instance, where it's no coincidence to see boxes delivered by a truck with "L.C.'s Meats" on the side. Other joints that grind their own beef include the Fuddrucker's chain, which has its own in-house butcher shop in every restaurant. Places like the Westport Flea Market (which uses meat from McGonigle's) work, too.

I love a good burger, but that crap from fast food chains (I'm looking at YOU, Mickey D's and Wendy's) isn't fit for human consumption.

report   
Posted by Realist on October 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM

I can't worry myself about that stuff. Ground beef, aspartame, MSG...bring it on.

report   
Posted by jjskck on October 6, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Latest in Fat City

Author Archives

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation