Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Kansas State professor loses 27 pounds on snack cake diet

Posted by Charles Ferruzza on Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM

click to enlarge Little Debbie...tastier than Ayds?
  • Little Debbie...tastier than Ayds?

Little Debbie is more than just an illustration of a cute little girl featured on boxes for a nationally-distributed brand of snack cakes. She's a diet plan!

Who knew?

Yesterday's health report on cnn.com featured a story about Kansas State University's Mark Haub, professor of human nutrition, losing 27 pounds by going on a ten-week diet of Little Debbie Nutty Bars, Swiss Rolls, muffins, powdered donuts, Hostess Twinkies, corn chips and Oreo cookies.

Haub's body mass index went from 28.8 -- considered overweight -- to 24.9, which is in the normal range. He now weighs 174 pounds. He didn't survive merely on junk food during his ten-week diet. Each day he also ate vegetables (typically a can of green beans and a few celery stalks), a protein drink and a multi-vitamin pill.

After ten weeks of munching on sweet treats, Haub's LDL (or "bad" cholesterol) dropped 20 percent and his "good" cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent.

This isn't the first time, of course, that a "snack" item has been used as a way of losing weight. Nearly four decades ago, the Campana Corporation -- which bought Allied Products of Kansas City in the late 1950s -- introduced a weight-loss candy called Ayds (sold in chocolate, butterscotch, chocolate mint and caramel flavors).

The active ingredient in those tasty Ayds taffy-like sweets was benzocaine (which is frequently used in cough drops, canker sore medications, and certain varieties of condoms to prevent premature ejaculation). Unfortunately, the early years of the AIDS epidemic was a marketing disaster for Ayds candy. That and the fact that the product didn't really work.

Professor Haub of Manhattan, Kansas, however, may have proven that snack cakes may be the secret to a thinner waistline.

(Image via Flickr: roadsidenut)

Tags: , , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Is the professor willing to feed his children this diet? How about filling the lunch rooms with this diet in the public schools in his hometown? Would he like to take responsibilty for what would follow?

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by andy on 11/19/2010 at 6:26 PM

He is making a great point. It's about intake VS output, stupid. The talking heads flap their mouths constantly about this food or that food. All it does is give folks too many excuses. I'm too poor to eat right, I'm too busy to eat right. Organic this, trans fat that...none of it matters as much as shutting the pie hole and eating in moderation. My kid who eats Lucky Charms for breakfast and is active physically can kick your kid's butt who eats steel cut organic oatmeal with soy milk and sits around and watches TV all day. Sorry, it is not very complicated.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Will Corrigan on 11/10/2010 at 3:39 PM

Sounds to me like he was just trying to prove a point: if calories in < calories out, you will lose weight. It doesn't matter what comprises those calories in.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by jjskck on 11/09/2010 at 11:50 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Latest in Fat City

More by Author

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation