Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Should restaurants charge a baby fee?

Posted by on Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:30 AM

Should babies be paying their way at restaurants too?
  • Ad Rants
  • Should babies be paying their way at restaurants, too?
Restaurants often offer promotions wherein children eat free. Kids' meals are typically less expensive. These are traditional marketing strategies that account for two things: Kids eat less, and they typically come attached to at least one full-paying adult.

But a restaurant in Croydon, England, is apparently turning that idea on its head [h/t Eater]. Cosmo, an Asian buffet, is now charging a baby plate fee of 3 pounds (about $4.67 in U.S. dollars). Should parents be made to pay for a baby at the table, the same way a plate-sharing fee might apply? Would you go to a restaurant that charged a baby fee?

Comments (25)

Showing 1-25 of 25

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-25 of 25

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2013 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation