Bristol 303, regularly, frequently. The menu is fresh, dependable, reasonably priced and the place feels great inside. Also, there are different daily specials, too.
That and I went to Cafe' Sebastienne last week for brunch. Thoroughly enjoyed the asparagus salad with great, rich, full-bodied, smooth (not bitter Starbucks type) coffee.
I hope you're not going soft, Charles, on critiquing restaurants and food and restaurateurs. Something in this seems to possibly suggest you aren't being fully honest--scathing--if required. Naturally, hope I'm wrong.
This article, however, is like the reporter who goes up to, say, a political official and says "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
Mo Rage
the blog
For clarification on my earlier note, I meant what I said about supporting Nanook's note but didn't read that he was calling Lynne Bratcher a "geriatric 3rd tier graduate too afraid to go to trial." I'm not in on that part, for what it's worth. There was no need or backing of or for that, to me, for what it's worth.
It seems he wrote in his note to you better than he does on his blog.
Side note: I couldn't agree with you more, Nanook.
Mo Rage
And how can we disagree, really? How could we possibly debate this?
Truth is, we can't.
Mo Rage
Re: “Does the city need a new, billion-dollar Kansas City International?”
Nonsense.
The layout at KCI as it is now not only works but nearly everyone who uses it--whether a lot or a little--like it and like its convenience and accessibility.
There's no reason in the world we can't take Terminal B, make it the security clearance terminal, as either wanted or needed, and then run enclosed walkways out to Terminals A and C, thereby getting everything needed--security, convenience, additional concessions (if they come) and cost savings. To a) throw away an airport and then b) build an extremely costly new one is both financially and environmentally irresponsible to the point of stupid.
Mo Rage