http://www.pitch.com/FastPitch/archives/2012/06/22/kansas-revokes-ann-kristin-neuhaus-medical-license-over-abortion-referrals Comments On: Kansas revokes Ann Kristin Neuhaus' medical license over abortion referrals by Jonathan Bender en-us Copyright 2013 Pitch. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Pitch readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Pitch. neilk@atiba.com (Pitch Webmaster) Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500 Fri, 24 May 2013 03:45:00 -0500 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by John McKean]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:23:15 -0500 Pitch Posted by Jeffrey Heavin]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:05:48 -0500 Pitch
I appreciate your providing your points, but I disagree with you. I don't think our major cities are all that different than any major cities around the world.
Posted by SoTiredOfMorons]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:55:08 -0500 Pitch
So your conclusion is that if I am not a fundamentalist, evangelical christian that believes in forcing my religious beliefs onto the entire population of my state, I must be a pagan or agnostic or atheist (all fine options)? You, my friend, are the one that needs to read more, travel and learn.
Posted by SoTiredOfMorons]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:28:13 -0500 Pitch Posted by Jeffrey Heavin]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:08:00 -0500 Pitch More to the point, ... what determines murder is murder? If you have no moral basis for saying that killing someone is wrong, it isn't wrong.
Posted by Jack]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:26:56 -0500 Pitch Posted by SoTiredOfMorons]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:47:49 -0500 Pitch
Uh, try again. Shooting my kid is illegal.
Posted by SoTiredOfMorons]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:37:34 -0500 Pitch
Pot calling kettle, Pot calling kettle are you as black as I am?
Posted by Jack]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:48:14 -0500 Pitch Posted by An educated professional]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:24:58 -0500 Pitch
To the idiot who thought that Dr. Neuhaus performed abortions, how can you comment on an article you didn't even take the time to read. It's only a few paragraphs and you didn't even read it.
Posted by SoTiredOfMorons]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:05:25 -0500 Pitch
"looks like the devil herself"
"feels as if his voice should be exalted"
"bitch signed off on abortions without ever seeing the patient"
"you lefties think that government should be able to violate my rights to own firearms"
"Left-winged sheep love paying taxes"
"the baby butchering, leftwing nut, lemming, sodomites"
"Might as well argue about dropping the bomb on Hiroshima"
Posted by JaCoMo]]> Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:44:33 -0500 Pitch Posted by Jack]]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:34:14 -0500 Pitch Posted by Compassion and Reason Be Damned!]]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:00 -0500 Pitch Posted by MousieCat]]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:36:06 -0500 Pitch Posted by justthefactsmaam]]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 08:54:26 -0500 Pitch Posted by Jeffrey Heavin]]> Sat, 23 Jun 2012 08:01:58 -0500 Pitch
Yeah, sure you do.
Posted by luger]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:31:42 -0500 Pitch Posted by Susan Santos]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:57:53 -0500 Pitch Posted by Todd Andrew Fiedler]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:19:40 -0500 Pitch Posted by Jack]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:16:32 -0500 Pitch Posted by Smitty PA]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:23:46 -0500 Pitch
even IF you are satisfied with your current healthcare plan.

Knuckleheads keep getting themselves wrapped up in their own web.
Posted by luger]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:09:46 -0500 Pitch
What an amazingly intellectual reason to pass judgement upon the good doctor, Michelle.

You right-wingers make me sick.

You really do.

Fanatical anti-abortion activists, like yourself, have only themselves to blame for the constitutional ramifications of the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in regards to Roe v. Wade.

Forty years ago, anti-choice activists attempted to play God by mandating that women seeking to have an abortion would have to go in front of a state-appointed panel who would determine for the patient whether the requested procedure was, in their eyes, a "good abortion" (a pregnancy that was the consequence of rape or incest, or would endanger the life of the mother), or a "bad" abortion (the consequences of poor family planning).

This was, of course, in total disregard of the reality that the actual medical procedure was the same, no matter what the moral decisions were leading up to the procedure's necessity.

The Supreme Court therefore properly ruled that government could not intervene, simply on moral grounds, between a patient and the private medical decisions they made in consultation with their physician.
Posted by Del Wasso]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:46:07 -0500 Pitch
Same principle, or does it vary according to who benefits?
Posted by luger]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:43:03 -0500 Pitch