Earlier this week we reported that Kris Kobach has raked in more than $115,000 defending Hazleton, Pennsylvania — a town sued by the ACLU for passing an immigration ordinance that would punish landlords and business owners for hiring or harboring illegal immigrants. Having helped Mayor Lou Barletta craft the sweeping measure, the University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor stepped in to defend the small city. But Kobach argues he’s no “mercenary.” Though he doesn’t dispute the triple-digit payout we reported, he says it’s a crude representation of his compensation.
“That’s actually sort of a gross number, that includes all the flights to and from Pennsylvania, fifteen days in hotel rooms and some students who, over the summer, wanted to do some work, so I’ve been paying them, as well,” Kobach told the Pitch on August 2, having phoned in from a law school speaking engagement on the East Coast.
“The title, ‘Kobach Cashes In,’ sounded like I was making a mint off it,” he said. “But I’m charging 50 percent of the rate that a Philadelphia partner would charge for the work and two-thirds the rate a Kansas City lawyer would charge.”
He says he’s ready to go pro bono if the city can’t meet his reduced-rate fees. “If they run out of money, I told them I’d represent them for free and finish this case out until the end,” he says.
Until then, we’d wager that Kobach is making more in his part-time defense of Hazleton than most residents of the small Pennsylvania town — especially the immigrants targeted by ordinance. – Carolyn Szczepanski
Showing 1-3 of 3
I have to agree with CSG, Mr. Kobach should indeed be compensated for work performed. If that total is the gross amount, it pales in comparison to amounts paid to similar professionals.
Kobach is a CONSTITUTIONAL lawyer, so this case is right down his alley. Ask around and you'll find it is very common for professors (private and public schools) to apply their trade in the real world in this way. He should be paid for his work, just as other professors get paid for speaking, teaching at other schools, consulting, writing books, and so on. In fact, it probably makes them better professors.
Why in the world would he be charging $200 an hour for his time on this? He's comparing himself to partners in law firms for billing purposes, but where's his overhead? He has a taxpayer funded office, taxpayer funded library, and I'd be willing to bet he's cheating Westlaw by using his academic account for the lawsuit.
like
dislike
