You know things are going to get ugly in Paris Hilton’s lawsuit against KC-based Hallmark Cards when one of the greeting card company’s recent court filings begins with this paragraph:
“Paris Whitney Hilton (‘Hilton’) is a privileged, jet-setting heiress to the Hilton family fortune, the center-of-attention ‘celebutante’ at the most lavish parties and exclusive events, and a consummate self-promoter who, by her own admission, considers working ‘manual, low-paying jobs’ and serving the public to be her ‘private nightmare.’”
Hilton’s suit is over a card that portrays her as a waitress giving a warning to a patron by pointing to his plate and saying her trademark line, “That’s hot.” Hilton claims in the lawsuit that it’s a trademark phrase. Hallmark claims in its recent court filing that it has a first amendment right to publish the card, which is, in the company’s own words, is in the “public interest.”
Click here to read the 32-page answer from Hallmark. -- Eric Barton
Showing 1-10 of 10
We've been watching Paris Hilton's BFF. Where do they come across these people? They are from another planet!
I wish Paris Hilton would come to Kansas City and kick Adele Hall in her old wrinkled hootchie.
paris hilton's trademark is 'thats hot' not that's hot. so i think hallmark should be fine.
roses are hot
violets are hot
some people are smart
paris is not
this is ridiculous.
She needs a clue... she is a waste of matter and space.
A clue would be hot.
this is ridiculous.
She needs a clue.
A clue would be hot, she's not.
This is rediculous.
There's real news going on, she needs a clue.
A clue would be hot.
Lose the second "is" in that last sentence, please.