Plog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

You guys might want to check out our follow up, The death of Wink II: Trouble in Minnesota. I interview Rich, who, on review, doesn't dispute what Richardson claims and calls her own responses to this story 'abrupt.'

report   
Posted by Peter Rugg on 03/13/2009 at 12:09 PM

Well, goodness...

I am very easy to find you know...sitting right out in the open writing health policy pieces in Minneapolis/St. Paul. And from one journalist to another, I would have to say your research is pretty shoddy to not even do a basic search for me. Because plenty of people did and pointed me to this story.

If Mr. Rugg would like to know why I am in Minneapolis instead of making me sound like a lovestruck ninny in a community I care about deeply and plan on returning to after I'm done with my fellowship and MPH work, I'd love to talk to him. Until then, an apology would do.

elizabeth rich
www.mn2020.org

report   
Posted by Elizabeth Rich on 02/28/2009 at 11:02 PM

I DON'T read the Pitch or the Plog...but I was curious when I saw a link on Tony's (is that much better?--well, at least he tends use facts in his arguments) and clicked--not knowing I would land in this pile of shit.

report   
Posted by dsigusted, again on 02/12/2009 at 2:24 PM

To disgusted again: please keep reading The Pitch and The Plog, because it is what they have come to expect from you for several years now.

report   
Posted by henry on 02/12/2009 at 8:21 AM

Wow. I am pretty appalled that anyone even let this story go to print. It is so inaccurate and unsubstantiated. And you didn't even talk to Elizabeth!

While Elizabeth did move to Minneapolis, the shop had started to fail long before that happened. (Ask some of the people she borrowed money from--or tried to get emergency loans from.) She had first considered staying here while her fiance lived there--but the shop was failing--and terribly. Minneapolis was a landing place after a failed course of action...not a action of "love."

It's so amazingly insulting that you try to make it sound like she chose her man over her shop. What a sexist, arrogant, and cliched approach to a real story.

Terry's quotes are nice, but "lost incentive" is horribly and recklessly inaccurate. She was losing money! Not incentive!

BTW, you could have easily found Elizabeth Rich. I tried, and did in less than two minutes.

HORRIBLE "reporting." Absolutely irresponsible. But that is what I have come to expect of the Pitch for several years now.

report   
Posted by disgusted, again on 02/12/2009 at 7:08 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation