Considering where this series began -- with Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts' $525,000 in campaign contributions from the health-care industry -- it ends on a number that's almost pathetic by contrast.
When I started counting campaign contributions earlier this month, Roberts was the first; his amount struck me as outrageous (Roberts sits on the Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, so I wasn't surprised that medical interests were heavily invested in his work). I didn't know what I'd find when I started adding up everyone else's. (What I found: Rep. Dennis Moore, $62,000; Sen Claire McCaskill, $132,000; Rep. Sam Graves, $85,500; Senators Kit Bond, $20,500; and Sam Brownback, $11,500; and Lynn Jenkins, $33,129). I did all of this in mostly random order and never set out to end with the politician who had the lowest amount.
But that's how it happened. In 2007-2008, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver's campaign committee banked a total of $554,099 (it apparently doesn't cost much to run against Jacob Turk; in his 2008 election, Cleaver got 64 percent of the vote to Turk's 35 percent; the Republican was challenging Cleaver for the second time). Of that total, a whopping $9,500 came from medical-industry interests:
$3,000
Blue Cross and Blue Shield
$2,500
American Society of Anesthesiologists
$2,000
American Medical Association
$1,500
Bayer
$500
Healthsouth
Which kind of makes me feel sorry for the guy. Considering what he's been through at the hands of reform opponents, maybe Bayer could at at least kick in a couple extra aspirin, too.
Showing 1-1 of 1
Well, if you really care about special interest money influence, then you would check Emanuel Cleaver's FEC report on contributions from the financial services sector of the marketplace, not health care.
Why? Because Cleaver sits on the financial services oversight committee. Cleaver has received $71,000 from that sector.
Kinda a conflict of interest, no?
like
dislike
