Friday, September 11, 2009

KS Supreme Court to consider temporary suspension of former JoCo DA candidate's law license

Posted by Justin Kendall on Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:32 AM

click to enlarge Scott Hattrup
  • Scott Hattrup

Scott Hattrup, a Johnson County attorney and unsuccessful Republican candidate for the Kansas statehouse and for Johnson County District Attorney, is scheduled to go before the Kansas Supreme Court next Friday to try to stop his law license from being temporarily suspended.

On August 21, Hattrup was supposed to appear at an ethics hearing before the Office of Disciplinary Administrator,

which hears complaints against lawyers in the state of Kansas. But Hattrup was in the Johnson County jail on civil contempt charges for failing to comply with a divorce decree from April 2008. 

Johnson County District Court Judge Kevin P. Moriarty had ordered Hattrup

"to enter into and execute a contract to list

for a sale" a house at 11925 West 92nd Terrace in Lenexa by July 29. He didn't do

it, so he was arrested for contempt.

Hattrup's next hearing before the Disciplinary Administrator is scheduled for November 5 at 9:30 a.m. Hattrup faces three complaints against him: Two filed by

Lisa Daniels and one by former Kansas lawmaker Patricia Kilpatrick.


In July 2008, Hattrup appeared before the disciplinary administrator to

answer an ethics complaint by Daniels, who alleges in her complaint that Hattrup didn't complete

paperwork

so she never received child support payments. She also claims that she

gave Hattrup all of her husband's guns, but Hattrup never gave her a

receipt for the guns. She claims Hattrup didn't return all of their

property, and they had to file a police report with the Overland Park

Police Department.

The complaint filed by the disciplinary administrator's office says

Hattrup never responded to the complaint.


Daniels' second complaint against Hattrup was filed in June 2007 for

representing another man in small-claims court against her husband, Rob

Daniels. Daniels claims Hattrup had a conflict of interest due to

duties to her as a former client.

In

a complaint filed with the disciplinary administrator in May 2008,

Kilpatrick claims that Hattrup pursued her romantically, even showing up

at her home uninvited at late hours (she

wasn't interested) while representing her in a case before the Kansas

Governmental Ethics Commission. Kilpatrick claims Hattrup agreed to a

$45,000 fine without her knowledge.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation