Plog

Archives | RSS

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Comments (21)

Showing 1-21 of 21

Add a comment

Present your findings please, since you want to criticize everyone else so much.

report   
Posted by Gmccarron2006 on March 22, 2011 at 7:06 PM

A quite good article and exceptional blog. Is there any way I can subscribe to new articles, you know like acquiring them on email or something like that.

report   
Posted by Scot Harness on September 1, 2010 at 8:37 AM

(Critical Thinker says:

A lot of posts by anti-science global warming deniers, but none of them have given any reasons why anyone would make this up. I'll ask again: What is to be gained by lying about global warming?)

okay, if you are sincerely interested, watch this program:

http://video.google.com/videop...

pay special attention to what the former greenpeace founder says.

report   
Posted by dean b on January 1, 2010 at 6:36 AM

To the individual who asked what is to be gained about lying about global warming?

MONEY is to be gained. An election was based off of being a country that would lead the way in going green. Billions have been spent and dontated to companies in the name of going green. Mike Thompson may be a religious man, but the entire interview was about the bad science behind global warming. Think about it the Earth went from being a desert to being covered in ice and then warmed enough to support human life without any input from mankind. Why do we think that now the change has to do with us.

report   
Posted by MWRelis on December 27, 2009 at 1:24 AM

LOL......Mr. Betancourt proved my previous post and even managed to add in some delicious new craziness. Prince Charles? Ken Lay? Swine Flu? I'm surprised that he didn't complain about how hard it is to find a good tin foil these days.

report   
Posted by KansasVoter on December 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM

I have never seen so many people begging to be conned.The So-Called science proving Global Warming is bought and manipulated.This whole hoax is a money making venture,a hustle.You dont find it suspicious that all these major financial interesrs are behind it.Frontman Al Gore an elitist with family ties to English royalty and a best buddy of prince Charles has already made millions off this scam.Ken Lay of Enron fame helped Gore cook up this Carbon trading nonsense.Oh yes,pay your indulgences to the church of Gore and other wealthy Con MEN.Stop being chumps and see this for what it is.Poor countries are not goin get squat that is just a smiley face put on this SCAM.Global Warming,Swine Flu,and Al Queda all sold to a weak minded brain washed public

report   
Posted by Juan Betancourt on December 6, 2009 at 1:53 AM

All I've read from the anti-science global warming deniers are tired old right-wingnut talking points that have been discredited years ago. You just keep repeating your conspiracy theories about tree huggers, Algore, and NAZIS!!!, but you still don't have anything behind your rantings except for your own delusions.

report   
Posted by KansasVoter on December 5, 2009 at 10:21 AM

just remember to follow the money. this is about corporations making money and the way to move the herd is to create a CLIMATE of fear. Propaganda is easy to manufacture and look at Al gore, he tells so many lies that not even he can distinguish the truth from fiction. since this is all about money let's have a look at BIG AL'S bank accounts. it's always about the money. it's the western mindset

report   
Posted by thomas pained on December 5, 2009 at 6:50 AM

Grant money. Money, control, power. There have been millions made on this fraud. Carbon trading?!!? Hello. It's a whole new commodity they want to create.

They want to tax what you exhale!?!? CO2 is not a pollutant. They have made you believe that not only is what you exhale and what vegitation needs to survive is a pollutant, but now they have made you believe cow farts and your breath should be taxed and traded in the market place!

Good grief man, there's millions of dollars at stake for these frauds. Of course they're digging in about their lies. Just like any convicted swindler, Madoff, Ken Lay, etc. This is the newest and biggest fraud of all. But this one actually harms every one of us.

It destroys industry, jobs, your freedom to drive an SUV, use a standard lightbulb, etc. I could write all night on this man. Wake up. What's to be gained?

I don't know, what was to be gained when the Natzis created the science of a superior race?! Control, money - this ain't science.

report   
Posted by Honest, Critical Thinker on December 4, 2009 at 4:59 PM

A lot of posts by anti-science global warming deniers, but none of them have given any reasons why anyone would make this up. I'll ask again: What is to be gained by lying about global warming?

report   
Posted by KansasVoter on December 4, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Peer review will settle this. The peer review must be done outside of the 30 or so scientists/climatologists that have orchestrated the current theory.

report   
Posted by DPW on December 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Nevermind that the data regarding increased global temperatures IS aligning with data. The hack at East Anglia exposes nothing but competitive researchers that lost the plot. The plot, however, is way bigger than the agenda of those researchers.

Temps from 1600-1800 were not statistically significantly different than other periods- and this does not at all refute the rapid rise in temperatures in the past century, to say nothing of the ten warmest years on record.

Dan is right but wrong. Doing silly little things isn't going to do anything, any more than changing out SUVs for Priuses will. The wheels are in motion, so I'd just get used to longer droughts and hanta virus, if I were you.

report   
Posted by Simon on December 4, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Not a big fan of Mike Thompson but I will give him credit for taking this stand. Lots of information is coming out showing how all the science behind the global warming hypotheses is lacking.

This is not to say that many of the green initiatives are bad. In fact, many of the things folks can do to "be green" can in fact save family an businesses money by reduced utility/energy costs.

What is flawed is the "green group think" that justifies extreme activities that will hurt the economy and not do one thing to stop/reduce global warming. Things like additional taxes based on the energy you use, the ability to "buy carbon foot print credits aka Al Gore" to make up for the energy you are using, or signing internal agreements that would basically send our hard earned tax dollars to 3rd world nations based on the amount of energy we consume.

It is not bad to want to do right by the environment. Frankly if each person does their part, use more energy efficient appliances, weather proof their homes to reduce energy waste, drive a little less or get fuel efficient vehicles all of this will help in the long run.

But make no mistake -- those efforts will not stop the normal cycle of nature.

Don't believe me -- do some homework. Start with Europe around the 1600 - 1800 century and the weather conditions that result in famine because crops won't grow. When you look back at history you will see why Man Made Global Warming theories are starting to get unraveled.

Go green but for the right reasons

report   
Posted by Dan on December 4, 2009 at 10:44 AM

At this moment I wouldn't mind it being a few degrees warmer. Can Jesus make that happen?

Maybe not, but I'll bet his competition can.

report   
Posted by Realist on December 3, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Can someone explain what teaching of Jesus says anything about not belieing in science?

report   
Posted by THC on December 3, 2009 at 8:02 PM

Another interesting quote from the article, notice the word "fact":

"The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth�s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. �A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,� warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, �because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.�

report   
Posted by manuel623 on December 3, 2009 at 7:20 PM

Newsweek, April 28th, 1975. Huge article about "Global Cooling". That was "fact". Here's a little snippet of the article:

"Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality."

What's the next eco-horror story they are going to come up with?

report   
Posted by manuel623 on December 3, 2009 at 7:14 PM

At this moment I wouldn't mind it being a few degrees warmer. Can Jesus make that happen? Pretty please?

report   
Posted by That Guy on December 3, 2009 at 5:17 PM

Trying to �save the planet� is arrogant, George Carlin said. �The planet has been through a lot worse than us.�

In the early 1900s Scientific American said IF ONLY Americans (read white men) were allowed to farm the land in Oklahoma they would turn it into a breadbasket which would feed the nation.

So a few years later Oklahoma is made a state and opened to the white man's plow.

So how did that work out?

By the 1920s the top soil was blowing away and soon so were the farmers (blowing to the state for California. Fucked that up too).

That's the problem with incompetent people, they don't know they are incompetent and rush hell-bound-for-leather with a solution which turns out to intensify the problem.

Of course I have no answers, just like the two most vocal sides of this debate.

report   
Posted by Orphan of the Road on December 3, 2009 at 4:26 PM

An on-air personality for Fox who is a bible-thumper and doesn't believe in global warming. I've never heard of such a thing! [roll eyes]

edmo--What is gained by lying about global warming? That's an honest question. I believe that man-made global warming is real, and I don't see any reason why anybody would like about it being real. Why do you think that man-made global warming is a myth? Please tell me in your own words with reputable links that back up your opinion.

report   
Posted by KansasVoter on December 3, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Thompson is right. Global Warming is a myth. You leftist love to believe that there is proof of this but there isn't! Face it. Why do you want global warming to be proven so bad, what do you have to gain? Anyone with half a brain, especially now that it's been debunked, knows the scientists behind this were fraudulent. Give it up Peter Rugg, I know this is the pitch and this is the kind of place for an idiotic article to show up, but you really sound ignorant. Why don't you quit hugging trees and learn how to be a journalist. then you could get a real job at the falling star.

report   
Posted by edmo on December 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-21 of 21

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation