Friday, June 18, 2010

MO Sen. Brad Lager on why we shouldn't worry about losing the fees to pay for water protection

Posted by Nadia Pflaum on Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:00 AM

click to enlarge Sen. Brad "Down with DNR" Lager
  • Sen. Brad "Down with DNR" Lager

Missouri Department of Natural Resources officials blame state Sen. Brad Lager (R-Maryville) for terminating the department's ability to collect fees for State Operating Permits that fund the state's Water Protection Program for 2011. The bill that would have extended those funds was expected to pass on the last day of the legislative session in May, but Lager sent it to the Fiscal Oversight Committee for further review instead.

During an interview for this

week's story,

Lager said that his failure to pass the bill wasn't part of some

diabolical scheme to undercut DNR's authority. Nor was his investigation

into the E. coli controversy at the Lake of the Ozarks an attempt to

smear Gov. Jay Nixon's administration, as the minority members of

Lager's commission on Commerce, Consumer

Protection, Energy and the Environment have alleged.

"This

is not a Jay Nixon issue, so

I want to be really clear about that," Lager said. "DNR, fundamentally

and

structurally, this is a mindset they have carried for decades. It's

just consistently getting worse, and it's time for it to end."

Does he have some special animosity against Nixon's appointed head of

DNR, Mark Templeton? "All I know is, he (Templeton) grew up on

the East Coast and now he's here telling Midwest farmers and industry

how they should run their businesses," Lager said. So...yes?

click to enlarge Lager likes it when DNR director Mark Templeton squirms.
  • Lager likes it when DNR director Mark Templeton squirms.
Lager said that he's been told by other senators that the DNR's water protection program has enough funds to continue to operate four to six months into 2011 without collecting permit fees. Lager promised he'd fast-track the bill to renew the fees at the beginning of the 2011 legislative session (assuming he is re-elected this November), if the DNR uses the time in the interim wisely.

First, Lager wants to see the DNR work with stakeholders -- meaning, the industrial and agricultural polluters that pay to discharge materials into the state's waters. "If you go back to the entire time we've had the Clean Water Act in place, DNR has held a stakeholder group meeting," Lager said. "...That's happened under every director of DNR for, I don't know, 20 years, until now. Now, the DNR [isn't] even having stakeholder meetings, and the ones they did have, they didn't reach consensus. They couldn't work with stakeholders, and as a result, the people who are meeting with me and talking about clean water issues are people who feel like they're being unfairly treated by DNR."

Lager also wants to see the DNR make progress toward implementing real-time water testing. "One of the provisions in that (permit-fee-renewal) bill was for DNR to follow up on that and come back to the general assembly with a plan to do it -- what does it cost and what do we need to do to make that a reality in this state?"

Functionally, the DNR's water program hasn't changed, Lager said, and the fee-collecting abilities will be restored if his bill's provisions are met by January. "But for DNR to continue to stall, to not provide leadership, and to not advance this initiative, meaning not having stakeholder meetings, not working with all the industries to get to a structure that everyone can live with -- to do nothing between today and the end of the year -- is unacceptable."

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Discharging is a privalige, not a right. If permitees were responsible for their actions, then a law like the Clean Water Act and agencies like EPA and DNR would not be needed. So, I don't want to hear, "Oh, those poor mistreated permittees". DNR does and has had stakeholder meetings, trying to reach a consensus. I don't see Lager at any of these meetings. And how dare he listen to one side of the story when he is supposed to represent the people of Missouri as a whole. Lager, come to a meeting and you will see why the permittees do not get their way. They would rather do away with environmental regulations all together, most of the time. Those regulations get in their way of doing buisness and make things hard, so they whine like 3 year olds, trying to get there way. Well, you know what, it is supposed to be hard. We are protecting public health here. No one ever said it was a "Tea Party".

report   
Posted by Anna on June 23, 2010 at 10:33 AM

Brad Lager is useless. Let's here it for politicians not getting all the info and once again not getting their facts straight! Lager is one of those politicians that give politicians a BAD name.

DNR is trying to run a Water Protections program with little funding. Idiots like Lager wage useless war against them all day long for not doing enough, and yet will not fix the problem by helping to fund them.

Go ahead Lager get Water Protection in this state turned over to EPA and watch them fine the daylights out over Missouri farmers and businesses.

Or get off your political soap box fund the DNR program made up of the same qualified individuals like the EPA has and watch them work with the Missouri's people to make the issues better.

report   
Posted by JJ on June 18, 2010 at 3:46 PM

Brad Lager sure mentions DNR's need to "work with industry" a lot in his interview--what about the need to work with the people that swim and fish in Missouri's waters every day and those who want to protect that water quality? If we've learned anything over the past year, it's exactly how much E coli and other pollutants have made it into the state's waters, and working with the people who put it there probably isn't going to get us to cleaner water.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 18, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation