Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Ex-Blockbuster employee loses microwave-popcorn-damages-lungs lawsuit (updated)

Posted by Justin Kendall on Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM

click to enlarge It's a trap!
  • It's a trap!

Update (1:44 p.m. August 3): Yesterday, I linked to a story about a Jackson County jury not siding with a former Blockbuster employee who claimed that popping bags of microwave popcorn damaged her lungs. A reader pointed out the ailment in question is called "bronchiolitis obliterans," or "popcorn lung." I'd never heard of popcorn lung before. Its symptoms are like asthma and supposedly linked to inhaling the vapors from a butter flavoring called diacetyl. The cases have ended anywhere from $20 million judgments to being successfully defended -- like the Jackson County one. In some of these cases, the popcorn eaters were inhaling up to seven bags a day. After hearing all of this, I'm going to lay off.



click to enlarge Orville_Redenbacher.jpg
Orville Redenbacher is

off the hook ... for now.

Original Story (1 p.m. August 2): Orville

Redenbacher's popcorn isn't responsible for damaging a former

Blockbuster employee's lungs, according to a Jackson County jury.

The

Daily Record in Kansas City reports that Elaine Khoury

blamed her "permanent lung disease" on popping and eating a couple of

bags of microwave popcorn from ConAngra Foods Inc. while working at

Blockbuster. But she wasn't just popping at work.

"But her trial, which started four weeks ago, also focused on her

exposure to the fumes while preparing two to three bags of microwave

popcorn at home over a 10-year period," The Daily Record reports.

Khoury

reportedly vowed to appeal the verdict.

Makes me want to throw out the funky smelling microwave popcorn I have at

home.

Editor's note: This story has been corrected from an original

version.

Tags: , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

yeah, with talk like that you were probably someone hoping to get a piece of the pie, yourself. but thats okay cause i feel great about my verdict, for Conagra...

report   
Posted by Anonymous on 10/25/2010 at 8:14 AM

everyone present could not believe the verdict came back in favor of conagra. someone somehow didn't take the evidence or judges verdict instruction into consideration. makes you wonder--were the jurors that stupid or was there some sort of other factors involved.

report   
Posted by anonymous follower on 08/06/2010 at 8:18 AM

Just like to give a big low five to all of you intellectually sub-Forest Gump jurors who let the popcorn industry off the hook. But, what the heck, you were chosen out the jury pool because the defense wanted the dumbest people they could find on that jury.

We are all in danger now. Diacetyl will still be used in a wide variety of consumer products because of you dumbasses.

report   
Posted by Consumer's anonymous on 08/03/2010 at 1:34 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation