Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Banning boobies and four other ways politicians pretend to have balls

Posted by Peter Rugg on Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:30 AM

click to enlarge These decisions are the political equivalent of putting Truck Nutz on your car.
  • These decisions are the political equivalent of putting Truck Nutz on your car.

Now that the primaries are over, the real high-gear campaigning can begin. That means politicians making a lot of grand promises about how they're going to send a message to those fat cats in Washington, D.C. They're running to lead, not to feather their own nests, goddamn it!

Ah, but it was always thus. As the world revolves around the sun, so will politicians always congratulate themselves for moves that require no courage. Here are just a few of the things they've done in our corner of the country to try and convince you they've got balls where there's only a greasy black cavity.



click to enlarge Sam Brownback joined the not-in-my-backyard chorus.
  • Sam Brownback joined the not-in-my-backyard chorus.
5. Missouri lawmakers pass legislation urging Congress not to transport Gitmo prisoners through the state

As my colleague David Martin already covered well in his June 2009 column "Prison City Goes Soft," for all their tough talk on terrorists, politicians don't actually want to have to help incarcerate one. Missouri politicians freaked about the idea of just transporting Gitmo prisoners to Leavenworth. U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas took it even worse, screeching that the facility that had already successfully held spies and terrorists -- including Mohammed Salameh, of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing -- couldn't possibly be expected to keep Gitmo prisoners. Politicians on both sides of the aisle acted like their stand against accepting the prisoners was somehow a bold refusal to endanger the good people of the Midwest. In fact, it just showed how scared they were to do anything to help deal with terrorism if the action wasn't taking place in a different hemisphere.


click to enlarge This man would never push a frivolous lawsuit.
  • This man would never push a frivolous lawsuit.
4. Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder's fight against health-care reform.

Ever since health-care reform was passed, Kinder's been talking to anyone with a microphone and a television camera about how he'll bravely fight for the citizens of Missouri. No one who can't afford it should be able to see a doctor! It's unconstitutional! He even went so far as to file a lawsuit against the legislation naming multiple big-name politicians, including Health and Human Services Director Kathleen Sebelius. Surely a Republican would never file a frivolous lawsuit that he knows will only take up valuable court time. All of this is for you, the common man, who refuses to wear the 10-pound beard of bees that is federal health-care reform. It is not just so he can keep getting on Fox News to build a national following. Nope.


click to enlarge Kelsey Smith's death became a campaign issue this year.
  • Kelsey Smith's death became a campaign issue this year.
3. Doing things for Kelsey Smith

The race between Jerry Moran and Todd Tiahrt got pretty ugly this election, but both men were guilty of exploiting a horrible event for personal gain. After Kelsey Smith was murdered, Moran rushed to name a bill after her -- with his own name attached. Later on, in Tiahrt's ads, Smith's family would complain that Moran hadn't even asked them about it, and Tiahrt was the Republican Kelsey Smith would've really wanted. I wouldn't presume to know what Kesley Smith would want. But she might not care for her life being reduced to a slogan on a campaign bumper sticker.


click to enlarge Lawmakers couldn't wait to ban K2.
  • Lawmakers couldn't wait to ban K2.
2. Banning K2 synthetic marijuana

The minute anyone heard about K2, the countdown to banning it began. Everyone knew that eventually this was going to be criminalized, regardless of what it's long-term health effects might be, because it got you high. If it gets you high, end of story. What was really shocking was the quickness with which Kansas acted to get it off shelves. With hundreds of millions of dollars lost from the state budget and an ugly, ugly year ahead of them, the first thing the Kansas Legislature did in this session was pass the K2 ban with almost no discussion. Off the record, a few told us they didn't think K2 was such a pressing concern, but who wants to be the guy who voted against banning it? Because you wouldn't be the politician who wants to have a reasonable discussion about what K2 might do to people and if there were legitimate uses for it. You'd be the dude who wants children to get high.


click to enlarge Matt Bartle likes to leave a lot to the imagination.
  • Matt Bartle likes to leave a lot to the imagination.
1. Trying to kill Missouri's Strip Clubs

Matt Bartle was a state senator with one thing on his mind. As long as he was in office, he was obsessed with the horrible thought that somewhere out there, some man was seeing boobies he was not married to. Horrors! Because Missouri's politicians had some basic sense about not destroying people's jobs for no good reason, his previous efforts failed. But this year he found a way to tie corruption and bribery investigations to a bill regulating strip clubs right out of existence. Once he'd made it look like anyone opposing the bill was on the take, he had no trouble protecting all those people who would turn into sex fiends and rapists the minute they saw a strange bit of areola. Every pussy politician afraid of losing his job, but with no problem ending jobs for a few thousand adult entertainment workers, fell in line.

Incidentally, Gov. Jay Nixon signed this ban while the K2 bill lingered on his desk for weeks without attention. Apparently adults seeing boobies was a more pressing concern than all those innocent children blowing their minds with gas-station faux-weed.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

This seem to be a hot subject lately, Im curious to know how many people feel the same way.

report   
Posted by Angelia Davoren on 08/17/2010 at 2:00 PM

Peter - That's certainly true for KCMO, though they still get puss points for the casino exemption. And Kansas dragged their feet not because they were trying to research health risks, but because they were researching whether it would be politically popular in a (selectively) conservative state. I guess what I'm saying is that both bans were motivated more for political reasons than for public health reasons.

% - Most of the people actively fighting the KCMO smoking ban were indeed local business people. They were worried about losing business to surrounding areas; those fears were mostly unfounded, especially now that smoking is basically banned everywhere anyway. The ones who really got hurt were those without the means to provide an outdoor smoking area.

Sorry, but the studies touted by the pro-ban people are just as laden with bullshit as those presented by the anti-ban folks. Both sides were/are full of exaggerations and lies. And there's nothing more bullshit than claiming "public health" when you grant an exemption to the largest drinking establishments in the metro.

(Full disclosure: I personally have enjoyed the smoking bans. I just think the rules should apply equally to all entities.)

report   
Posted by jjskck on 08/05/2010 at 1:23 PM

"The bar and restaurant lobby is made up mostly of independent businesspeople who don't have the time or money to fight it."

Actually, it's a lobby mostly funded by the tobacco industry. For years they disseminated bogus research first trying to assert that second hand smoke isn't really dangerous. Once that theory was easily debunked, they tried the populist don't-put-a-poor-business-out-of-business line on for size. The public saw through that bullshit, too.

report   
Posted by % on 08/04/2010 at 1:58 PM

Good one on the smoking bans. I might exempt KCMO on that one though, since we got to vote on it, and Kansas dragged their feet for years on their ban.

report   
Posted by Peter Rugg on 08/04/2010 at 1:48 PM

"They're", not "their".

Derp.

report   
Posted by jjskck on 08/04/2010 at 1:12 PM

I'd add smoking bans to the list.

They're easy to pass because no politician wants to be known the guy/gal who voted for lung cancer when their running for re-election.

Smokers are somewhere between sex offenders and vandals in the public's view, so there's little resistance there outside of a few intrepid libertarians.

The bar and restaurant lobby is made up mostly of independent businesspeople who don't have the time or money to fight it.

The only real challenge to the ban is the casino lobby...which makes the state of KS and the city of KCMO super pusses because they wrote casino exemptions into the law just so they didn't have to overcome big gaming's deep pockets.

report   
Posted by jjskck on 08/04/2010 at 1:06 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation