Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Claire McCaskill, Kit Bond team up to save the smog

Posted by Ben Palosaari on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:02 AM

click to enlarge Missouri's senators don't mind the smog, and neither should you.
  • Missouri's senators don't mind the smog, and neither should you.

A rare showing of touching bipartisan agreement paid off late last week, when seven senators talked the Environmental Protection Agency into nixing new rules set at reducing ozone in cities.

And Missouri's own two senators deserve much of the credit. The EPA had faced an August deadline to make the changes, which have set new standards for acceptable urban air quality. But under pressure from the Smoggy Seven, including Claire McCaskill and Kit Bond, the Bush Era ozone rules will remain in place at least until October.


Long story short, ground-level ozone is formed when exhaust from cars is

hit by sunlight. The current acceptable level is 75 parts per

billion, and the EPA wants to slice that to between 60 and 70 ppb. Too much

exposure to ground-level ozone can lead to icky problems like asthma and

bronchitis, and according to the advocacy group Clean Air Watch, even

death.

States and activists sued the EPA during the Bush

administration in 2008 to get them to make 60-70 ppb the standard. But now

senators want everybody to relax, take a deep breath (but not too deep!), and look at the compelling reasons to not change the

rules. In a letter to the EPA earlier this month, they wrote:

"Given the absence of new or different scientific data, EPA

should

maintain the current ozone standards. Moving to

change the standard again, outside of the Clean Air Act's normal

five-year review process, as local communities are struggling to meet

the existing standard, would be unfair and unwise."

They are

right that there's probably not any "new or different scientific data"

on ozone and health problems, because EPA already reviewed 1,700

studies showing that 60-70 ppb would be a healthy level. Plus, they say, changing ozone levels will be expensive. Like, $19-$90 billion

expensive, which could never, never justify the  $13-$100 billion in predicted

health benefits. As McCaskill says, that price tag would "compound the hardship that many are now facing in these difficult

economic times." We're in a recession, people. We don't have money to keep volatile organic compounds of nitrogen oxides out of your lungs. 

Tags: ,

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation