Thursday, September 8, 2011

Kansas City Chiefs are the NFL's ugliest team, according to study

Posted by Ben Palosaari on Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM

Avert your gaze! Its Americas ugliest football team!
  • Avert your gaze! It's America's ugliest football team!
Those NFL commercials are totally right. We really are "back to football." The results of a ground-breaking academic study are in: The Kansas City Chiefs are butt-ugly. In fact, according to the Ursinus College study, the Chiefs are the least attractive of all NFL teams.

The Wall Street Journal, which asked the school to conduct the study, reports that researchers looked at 320 football players — five from each team's offense and defense along with two of each club's most-photographed players — and looked at their facial symmetry, which is frequently used as a metric for attractiveness.

The Bills had a symmetry rating of 99.47. On the other hand, the Chiefs were found to be the least attractive team.

Researchers found that the Buffalo Bills, one of the league's suckiest teams, were the NFL's most handsome club. The paper reports: "To be clear, we're not saying there's any proven connection between winning football teams and good looks. If anything, it may be an inverse relationship: Teams with particularly attractive players might be guilty of favoring people who are more presentable than talented. Jennifer VanGilder, a professor of business economics at Ursinus who oversaw the research, said the lure of hiring pretty faces is unconscious."

Surprisingly, the paper says, the most attractive members of teams aren't the quarterbacks. So, which position had the prettiest guys? Kickers! Yes, the loser of the football team. The ugliest players are wide receivers.

Regardless of whether Matt Cassel is a hunk, we can all agree that this is probably not the boost these guys need after a disastrous preseason.


Follow The Pitch on Facebook and on Twitter @pitchplog & @KCPitchBen.

Tags: ,

Comments (15)

Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

Fans are pretty ugly too!

report   
Posted by suckit on 09/12/2011 at 2:08 PM

They're ugly and the suck! What a combo!

report   
Posted by Anon on 09/12/2011 at 2:06 PM

Who ever said that being pretty made you a football player was wrong. When you are a true football player and you care about the game then your being pretty or how you look doesnt matter. How you preform and winning is the only thing that should matter, not oh my gosh i broke a nail or did i need to cut my hair for this game or man those tights make you look fat not phat, lol. Wow how the game has changed and whoever did this research was probably a female. This by a true player of the game.

report   
Posted by Corey Baker on 09/09/2011 at 11:30 PM

hey...if we can't win by beating them, tackling and sacking them...hitting them high, taking their legs out from under them...couple of chop blocks, and late hits..facemask or two..

then by God, our Chiefs will just out UGLY them...

a win is a win is a win...I'll take it..!

report   
Posted by tresdognite on 09/09/2011 at 1:28 AM

This is the most asinine study I've ever heard concerning football . This has nothing to do with our most beloved and popular American sport . Don't waste our time you shit heads on this meaningless study you rocket scientist ! Duh !

report   
Posted by Ptah Herring on 09/09/2011 at 1:13 AM

Kickers white, receivers black. This study is racist!

report   
Posted by Michael on 09/09/2011 at 1:10 AM

Are you EFFin' kiddin'me! Whatta waste of bandwidth!

report   
Posted by Joseph LaGrassa on 09/08/2011 at 11:45 PM

Win or lose, I will always be a CHIEFS Fan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lets Go Chiefs!!!!

report   
Posted by Debra Taylor on 09/08/2011 at 10:05 PM

Look ugly, play ugly, win ugly. If we get to the Superbowl, who cares!

report   
Posted by UGLY CHIEFS FAN on 09/08/2011 at 7:22 PM

what a patently ignorant, useless "study". Of course, since it comes from Rupert Murdoch's rag, it just makes sense.

Mo Rage
the blog

report   
Posted by Mo Rage on 09/08/2011 at 6:02 PM

Do people get paid to do this kind of writing? There are architects, engineers, plumbers, electricians, brick masons, etc. who can't get work and these rummies brobably get $100,000.00 a year at some college to do this crap.

report   
Posted by Robertfenn on 09/08/2011 at 5:59 PM

Whatever, we have Andy STUDabaker.

report   
Posted by caroline on 09/08/2011 at 4:07 PM

I knew we should have kept Tony Gonzalez.

report   
Posted by Stevo on 09/08/2011 at 3:25 PM

Don't you proofread your copy? "Uglilest"?

report   
Posted by tw on 09/08/2011 at 2:19 PM

Well hopefully that just means what I have always said. You can't get a pretty boy to be a footballl player. You need jocks with big muscles and big attitude...and apparently less facial symmetry.

report   
Posted by ArynMoon on 09/08/2011 at 1:52 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

More by Author

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation