Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Petition seeks to put red-light cameras before voters

Posted by Justin Kendall on Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:17 AM

Will voters want these signs (and the red-light cameras) removed?
  • Will voters want these signs (and the red-light cameras) removed?
The fight against red-light cameras still rages, although it's been pretty quiet lately. However, it's about to get a lot louder if the petition drive against the cameras gains steam.

KMBC Channel 9 reported the petition drive that aims to wipe out Kansas City's 29 cameras, which since going live in the spring of 2009 have generated $9.7 million for the city in 97,000 tickets ($3.1 million of that has gone to American Traffic Solutions, which has a year left on its contract with the city).

The arguments are the same: The city argues that red-light cameras reduce red-light running as well as accidents. The opposition (one of the leaders is Sean O'Toole) argues that voters should have a say in whether the cameras should continue. They also say the cameras violate people's constitutional rights, presuming guilt before innocence by offering little proof on who was actually driving the vehicle.

I tend to agree with the findings of Rajiv Shah, an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago, who studied Chicago's use of the cameras, and his analysis found that collisions actually increase at intersections monitored by red-light cameras.

I've never believed the cameras were about public safety but about politicians with dollar signs in their eyes.

Tags:

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

When are they going to do something useful like teach people how to go when the light turns green. Or don't pull out in front of a black Dodge and make him slow down so you can drive 10 mph under the limit and turn at the next intersection, because you might get your funking yuppie ass ran over just so I can have a good laugh. Oh, what about these Lance Armstrong idiots that decide ride a bike at rush hour everyday both morning and night on busy roads. No wonder there are so many Republican pols around here because we are saturated with dumb fucks.

report   
Posted by jmac on 09/14/2011 at 1:15 PM

Does this mean Tracy Ward will finally go away?

report   
Posted by Friedman'sUncleMilton on 09/14/2011 at 1:11 PM

The only reason you would get hit running through a yellow light is if some Bozo coming the other way was running a red lite. A red lite that has been red since yours turned green.

The harm comes when you run a red lite.

report   
Posted by Wink Dinklemeyer on 09/14/2011 at 12:45 PM

Syncronize the lights so as to IMPROVE traffic flow instead trying to turn us all in to red light runners.

report   
Posted by Wink Dinklemeyer on 09/14/2011 at 12:42 PM

Studies found that the cameras have little impact on safety...in fact more folks tend to gun it at the yellow just to beat the red thereby causing accidents..the scam is for the company to make money...the amt the city puts out to purchase the camera and maintain them surpasses the revenue generated. I'm not talking from the perspective of an individual receiving the ticket but rather the clinician that has to treat the injuries. Let's place more of these cams in Overland Park as opposed to low income areas and see how popular these things are..while we're at it...let's put the cameras at every stop sign too (they have them up north).

report   
Posted by Insight on 09/14/2011 at 11:50 AM

I like the fact that less people are running these lights now. I don't mind stopping at the yellow lights. Too many people run yellow lights and it takes seeing a serious accident happen to appreciate them.

report   
Posted by Sue on 09/14/2011 at 11:37 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Most Popular Stories

Slideshows

All contents ©2012 Kansas City Pitch LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Kansas City Pitch LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.

All contents © 2012 SouthComm, Inc. 210 12th Ave S. Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of SouthComm, Inc.
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Website powered by Foundation